Health Wellbeing, ETF Investment, and IT Innovation on a Global Intelligence and Insight Platform

Transactional leadership, also known as managerial leadership, is that kind of leadership where managers use rewards and penalties to get the best work out of their employees.

An exchange or transaction serves as the foundation for the transactional executive leadership approach. The leader penalizes employees who fail to meet the established criteria and rewards those that complete their work to the required standards.

This relationship between a leader and their subordinates is predicated on beliefs that hold that people require structure, guidance, and supervision in order to perform their tasks because they lack self-motivation. According to the theory, employees will carry out their duties as directed by the transactional leader in return for the leader providing them with something they desire, like compensation.

The following are the three methods of transactional leadership:

Backup plan: Using a system of incentives, rewards, and penalties, transactional leadership employs extrinsic motivation and reinforcement theory. If they accomplish their objective, workers receive benefits and contingent rewards.

By exception, active management: By default, transactional leaders apply active monitoring by using Controlio to foresee problems and respond to them with remedial measures.

Exception-based passive management: By default, transactional leaders avoid becoming involved with the team and only step in when performance standards aren’t being fulfilled by their employees.

To attain transactional leadership, these strategies are applied in concert.

Table of Contents

Qualities of transactional leadership

According to transactional leadership, there are superiors and subordinates, and the latter exhibit the following traits:

not driven by self-interest;
driven by rewards and penalties;
adhere to well-defined objectives; and
needs to be properly watched over and controlled.

A structured setting with limited departures from established company procedures and well defined jobs with assigned duties is ideal for a transactional leadership style.

Transactional leadership theory states that this kind of leader operates inside the current framework of an organization. The goal of a transactional leader is to have followers produce quantifiable, well-articulated outcomes and ueba use cases. SMART goals, which stand for specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and time-bound, are another name for them.

A transactional leader assesses followers based on whether they fulfill predetermined standards and deliver desired outcomes. To keep their followers on course, transactional leaders play on their self-interest.

Transactional leadership promotes a hierarchical, directive relationship between boss and employee as well as rigorous adherence to protocols.

Transactional leaders frequently include:

straight
less adaptable
realistic
reactive

Implementations of transactional leadership in general:

strive to adhere to the regulations exactly;
promote effectiveness;
prefer structure to adaptability;
concentrate on short-term objectives;
involve less interpersonal relationships; and
Use reprimands and rewards.
A synopsis of transactional leadership’s past

The following notable individuals contributed to the development of leadership theory:

Weber, Max. This German sociologist developed the concept of several leadership styles and outlined what would later be known as transactional leadership theory in his 1947 book The Theory of Social and Economic Organization.

Burns, James MacGregor. Burns was a pioneer in the subject of leadership studies in addition to being a political scientist, historian, and presidential biographer. In his 1978 book Leadership, he developed the theory of transactional leadership by outlining its components and explaining how the transformational leadership approach depended on inspirational and charismatic leadership. Burns compared the two leadership philosophies and asserted that they were incompatible.

Bass, Bernard M. In the 1980s, Bass, a distinguished professor at the State University of New York at Binghamton, contributed to the advancement of the field’s knowledge of transactional leadership. He contributed to the work of Burns and Weber by outlining metrics for transformational leadership as well as the effects of leadership philosophies on performance and motivation. Additionally, Bass argued that while transformational and transactional techniques were different, they were not incompatible.

Following World War II, the transactional leadership style was widely used in the United States. With their emphasis on innovation and change, many contemporary businesses choose alternative supervisory philosophies, like transformational leadership. Even if these are increasingly prevalent in corporate culture nowadays, transactional leaders are still respected in institutions like the military and big businesses where rules and regulations are paramount.